Yogesh and Ram Bajad Advocate & Associates

List of Articles Related to Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court of India was inaugurated on January 28, 1950. It succeeded the Federal Court of India and established under the Government of India Act, 1935. Articles from 124 to 147 in Part V of the constitution deal with the organization, independence, jurisdiction, powers procedures of the Supreme Court. At present Supreme Court has 31 judges including the Chief Justice of India. 1. Article No.124 Subject matter:-Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court   2. Article No.125 Subject matter:-Salaries, etc.,of Judges 3. Article No.126 Subject matter:-Appointment of acting Chief Justice 4. Article No. 127 Subject matter:-Appointment of ad hoc Judges 5. Article No. 128 Subject matter:-Attendance of retired Judges at sittings of the Supreme Court 6. Article No. 129 Subject matter:-Supreme Court to be a court of record 7. Article No. 130 Subject matter:-Seat of Supreme

After all, why do lawyers wear black coat! In our country, in summer or cold weather, lawyers and judges wear only black coats, but have you ever wondered why lawyers wear black coats, then we tell you the reason for lawyers wearing black coats. The tradition of lawyers wearing black coats is believed to have started in England. In 1865, the royal family of England ordered the court to wear black on the death of King Charles II, after which the trend of wearing a black coat began. The Indian judiciary is run by the British system itself, so even in the courts of India, the custom of wearing black coats of lawyers has been going on till now. In India, black coat was made compulsory for lawyers in 1961. The black coat is considered a symbol of discipline confidence. Black color is considered a symbol of strength and authority. Black color is considered a symbol of blindness, anyway it is said that the law is blind, because blind person does not favor anyone. Wearing a black coat mean

Know what is the procedure for filing a case in consumer court? In this era of Bazaarabad, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was enacted to protect the interests of consumers. But due to changing times and complaints, this act has now been replaced by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The new Act, along with being more comprehensive and rigorous, has also brought simplified dispute resolution process and provision of e-filing of complaints. Now the consumer can file his complaint in his nearest court. In the current era of consumerism, people are competing to buy any non-essential items. Perhaps some vendors and companies are taking advantage of this. These people sometimes sell people of inferior quality, sell broken products, charge more than the fixed price, and sometimes the quantity of goods is given less. This type of cheating happens with one or the other consumer every day. Therefore, the Government has enacted the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to protect the interests o

Putting excessive tax burden on people will be social injustice Supreme Court Chief Justice SA Bobde said that tax evasion is a social injustice to the rest of the country. A week before the presentation of the General Budget, Chief Justice SA Bobde of the Supreme Court has made a big comment. He said that the tax burden should not be imposed on the citizens. Tax evasion is a social injustice to the rest of the country. But if the government imposes arbitrary or excessive taxes, it will also be a social injustice by the government itself. ”Chief Justice SA Bobde commented on the 79th establishment ceremony of the Income Tax Tribunal (ITAT). Chief Justice Bobde said that "Tax judiciary plays a very important role in raising resources in the country. The taxpayer should get proper and speedy dispute resolution so that it can be encouraged. He said that "a skilled tax judiciary should ensure that the cases arising out of valid assessment do not get caught in litigation&quo

How much is the citizenship law legal? Over 140 filed petitions were heard in the Supreme Court against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The Supreme Court has refused to ban the CAA for the time being. The Supreme Court said that only the Constitution Bench of five judges can give interim relief. The central government was asked to file replies on the new petitions in four weeks. The High Court has stayed the hearing on the petitions filed against the Citizenship Amendment Act. The cases of Assam and Tripura were separated by the Supreme Court. Let us tell you that before the commencement of the hearing, the court number one was completely packed, due to which all the three doors of the court have to be opened. The hearing of the three-judge bench headed by CJI SA Bobde caused trouble due to the crowd. On which the Attorney General said that the lawyers are not able to come in. There should be a peaceful atmosphere. something must be done. On this, Kapil Sibal said that this is t

Supreme Court ready for hearing on amendment petition of telecom companies on AGR Next week hearing In the Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) case, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the amendment petition in the Supreme Court of the telecom companies soon. On Tuesday, Chief Justice SA Bobde said that next week, the bench of Justice Arun Mishra, who will give its verdict in the case, will hear the petition. Meanwhile, senior lawyers Abhishek Manu Singhvi and CA Sundaram appearing for the telecom companies said that they are not challenging the decision. The companies are in talks with the central government for payment schedules. Actually the telecom companies have filed the amendment petition in the Supreme Court. In the petition, the companies have requested the Supreme Court to amend their order in which they were instructed to repay the entire amount by 23 January to the Center. Petition for schedule for payment In their petition, the companies have requested the court to a

 Supreme Court said, Mahatma Gandhi is more than Bharat Ratna The Supreme Court refused to issue any order or directive to the Government of India to confer the Bharat Ratna on Mahatma Gandhi. The court said that Mahatma Gandhi is bigger than any Bharat Ratna. On the petition demanding the award of Bharat Ratna to Mahatma Gandhi, the Supreme Court said that Mahatma Gandhi is above Bharat Ratna. People from all over the world respect Mahatma Gandhi very much. The court told the petitioner that he values ​​his feelings. So, he himself can give a memorandum to the government about this. In fact, the petitioner said that many people have been awarded Bharat Ratna till now. Mahatma Gandhi has not been given this honor yet. The Father of the Nation should also receive this honor. On this, the court told the petitioner, 'See, the court cannot hear this matter. If you wish, you can give a memorandum in this regard to the Central Government. In our view, Mahatma Gandhi is above Bhar

Census process notification has been released This year data will be collected under house-listing operations (list related to domestic works) before the 2021 census. The list of which questions will be asked for this, has been handed over to all census offices. In these questions, information related to smartphone, pipe gas connection and mobile number will also be asked for the first time, including your name and address. In this, information related to TV, Internet, toilets, sources of drinking water and vehicles will also be taken. Also, there will be many more questions including the name of the owner of the house, the address of the house and the condition of the house. However, this time the question related to taking banking services has been removed. This notification has come up on questions after the approval of the proposal of Census 2021 and NPR two weeks ago. Yogesh and Ram Bajad & Associates with law firm. A law firm is normally an organization betwe

This information of law will make you responsible and alert citizen … A law is made to run the country smoothly and it is necessary that people should have full knowledge of it. Learn some such laws, which can make your life better by being aware of…. It often happens to us that a policeman on the road gives us a scolding and we take the edge off our face. However, it should be that we know our legal rights and tell that policeman that your behavior like this is not appropriate. In such a situation, we are informing you about some such laws which are very important to know. After knowing them, you will be able to understand the difference between right and wrong legally and give security and awareness to other citizens with you. 1. Protection to pregnant women… According to Indian law, no company in the country can remove a female employee from a job during pregnancy. There is a provision for action on doing so. 2. Providing water in the

All legal action can only be taken notice once you want to take the unit or person to court. It is only a process that brings the law to court. The information sent is known as a legal notice. A legal notice is, therefore, a formal communication to an individual or institution, informing the other party of your intention to take legal action about them. This notice, when sent, states your intention before the legal proceedings and thus, makes the party aware of your complaint. Many times, a legal notice that serves another will take the other party on the heel, and the problem can also be resolved out of court, with fruitful discussion on both sides. And, if the other party is still not accepting the complaint, one can always initiate court proceedings after a particular interval, as stated by law. However a legal notice can serve as the purpose of negotiation between the parties and save time, effort and money which are usually incurred in court ca