Yogesh and Ram Bajad Advocate & Associates

पुलिस को कार्रवाई के लिए आदेश की आवश्यकता क्यों है: सुप्रीम कोर्ट सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बुधवार को दिल्ली के दंगों को खत्म करने में निष्क्रियता के लिए दिल्ली पुलिस को दोषी ठहराया, जिसने अब तक 27 लोगों की जान ले ली है और कुछ सौ घायल हो गए हैं। जस्टिस संजय किशन कौल और केएम जोसेफ की पीठ ने यह जानने की मांग की कि पुलिस को "भड़काऊ" टिप्पणी करने वाले के खिलाफ कार्रवाई के लिए "आदेशों की प्रतीक्षा" क्यों करनी पड़ी। सॉलिसिटर जनरल तुषार मेहता के विरोध के बावजूद यह कहा गया कि यह पुलिस के खिलाफ आलोचना को वैध बना देगा और इसे ध्वस्त कर देगा। मेरा एक पुलिसकर्मी मारा गया है और एक अन्य डीसीपी घायल हुआ है, मेहता ने तर्क दिया, अदालत से पुलिस के खिलाफ प्रतिकूल टिप्पणी न करने का आग्रह किया। पीठ ने हालांकि, इस आधार पर हिंसा पर एक सुनवाई करने से इनकार कर दिया कि इसका रीमेक शाहीन बाग विरोधी सीएए प्रदर्शनकारियों को कहीं और स्थानांतरित करने के लिए एक याचिका तक सीमित था। “दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण बातें हुई हैं। कौन कह सकता है कि जो हुआ है वह दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण नहीं है, ”न्यायमूर्ति कौल ने कहा। मेहता इस ब

A fundamental rule of our legal framework is that a judge or justice must not sit on a case where the individual is one-sided. This is significant so equity is done and so that equity is seen to be done. There are well established tests for genuine and apprehended legal bias however how these are applied can differ depending upon the accurate circumstance.  Some unfair/biased conduct in indian court by judges can be- Actual legal bias Real bias exists where a judge can be demonstrated to be so dedicated to a specific result that proof and arguments presented won't change that result. A judge must not manage a case where the person is one-sided against or in favour of one of the parties. Apprehended legal bias Apprehended bias exists where an honest layperson may sensibly believe that the judge probably won't manage the issue impartially. The test is whether there is a genuine chance (not a distant chance) of bias. It shouldn't be set up that the judge would

7 historical decisions of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court has taken several landmark decisions this year. In the last one month, four such big decisions have been taken which have brought relief to the citizens of the country. All these decisions have not only ensured justice but have also ruled on issues which the larger section of the society has refused to accept and accept. In the coming years in the country, these decisions will also prove to be very important to bring about a better change. Let us tell you about those seven big and historical decisions- First decision- Section 377 to be excluded from the category of crime On September 6, the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court took a major decision on Section 377 of the Law on Homosexuality and excluded it from the category of crime. That is, homosexual sex between two adults by consent was excluded from the scope of the offense by one vote. The court termed a part of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,

Your right is to register an FIR, know what is the difference between FIR and NCR It is often heard that 'Police is not registering First Information Report (FIR)'. In such a situation, many times the victim has to go to the police station, then many times have to give up and decide not to file an FIR. This is all because people do not know about their rights to register an FIR. Under the law, the police cannot refuse to register an FIR. It is also mentioned in section 154 of CRPC. Crimes in India are divided into two categories. The first is cognizable offence and the second is non cognizable offence. Serious crime The police do not require a warrant for arrest in a cognizable offense. These are serious crimes in which the police have to take immediate action. These do not require the magistrate to order the police to initiate an investigation. These include cases such as rape, murder, illegal confinement, damage to public property and taking bribe by public serva

Know what is the procedure for filing a case in consumer court? In this era of Bazaarabad, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was enacted to protect the interests of consumers. But due to changing times and complaints, this act has now been replaced by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The new Act, along with being more comprehensive and rigorous, has also brought simplified dispute resolution process and provision of e-filing of complaints. Now the consumer can file his complaint in his nearest court. In the current era of consumerism, people are competing to buy any non-essential items. Perhaps some vendors and companies are taking advantage of this. These people sometimes sell people of inferior quality, sell broken products, charge more than the fixed price, and sometimes the quantity of goods is given less. This type of cheating happens with one or the other consumer every day. Therefore, the Government has enacted the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to protect the interests o

This information of law will make you responsible and alert citizen … A law is made to run the country smoothly and it is necessary that people should have full knowledge of it. Learn some such laws, which can make your life better by being aware of…. It often happens to us that a policeman on the road gives us a scolding and we take the edge off our face. However, it should be that we know our legal rights and tell that policeman that your behavior like this is not appropriate. In such a situation, we are informing you about some such laws which are very important to know. After knowing them, you will be able to understand the difference between right and wrong legally and give security and awareness to other citizens with you. 1. Protection to pregnant women… According to Indian law, no company in the country can remove a female employee from a job during pregnancy. There is a provision for action on doing so. 2. Providing water in the