YR Associates - Important decision of Supreme Court on Aadhar card,

Important decision of Supreme Court on Aadhar card,

The Supreme Court gave an important decision today on the Aadhaar verdict. The Supreme Court, while reading the majority verdict on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Centre's important Aadhaar program and the 2016 law related to it, recognized that Aadhaar is the identity of the common man. The court said that the thinking behind Aadhaar is logical. Let us tell you that the Constitution Bench of five judges under the leadership of Chief Justice Dipak Misra reserved their verdict on the case on May 10 after a long hearing lasting 38 days. A total of 31 petitions were filed in the case, including the petition of former High Court judge KS Puttaswamy.



https://yogesh-ram-bajad-advocate-associates-in-indore-yr.business.site/


Let us know 10 big things related to this decision.

Decisions related to
  • Advocate General Mukul Rohatgi, who advocated for the government in the Supreme Court, said that "the impact of this decision will go far, because Aadhaar is linked to a lot of subsidies."

  • Mukul Rohatgi said that Aadhaar is also effective in preventing loot and destruction, which has been happening. Data security is very important, and the government has made it clear that it will protect the data. A law is also being brought in this regard.

  •  After this, the court started hearing the verdict. It is said that without Aadhaar, the educated people without the society have been recognized and it is not possible to duplicate Aadhaar. The Supreme Court said that unique means only one.

  •  During the hearing, the Supreme Court held that Aadhaar is the identity of the common man and said that no evidence of privacy violation has been found due to Aadhaar. While giving a ruling on the imperative of Aadhaar, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Aadhaar with some changes.

  • The Supreme Court said that the biometric data of Aadhaar cannot be copied. Also, no private party can see the data. The Supreme Court said that Aadhaar authentication data can be kept for only 6 months.

  • The Supreme Court said that organizations like UGC, CBSE and NIFT cannot ask for Aadhaar. Also, schools cannot ask for Aadhaar. The Supreme Court said that illegal migrants should not be given basis.

  •  The court said that mobile and private companies cannot ask for Aadhaar. The court also canceled the decision to link Aadhaar to mobile. The court also canceled the decision to link Aadhaar to a bank account.

  •  The Supreme Court said that the decision to link PAN card with Aadhaar will remain intact. Justice Sikri said, no child can be denied benefits / facilities due to not having an Aadhaar number.

  •  The Supreme Court removed section 57 of the Aadhaar Act. On the other hand, biometric data of Aadhaar will not be given to any agency without the permission of the court. The court said that agencies can ask for Aadhaar in security matters.

  • The Supreme Court said that Aadhaar can be passed like a regular bill. In 2016, it was passed as a money bill.


 Yogesh and Ram Bajad & Associates with law firm. A law firm is normally an organization between legal counselors who have met up to offer their skill to customers under one name. We provide you this service like – Cyber Law, criminal law, corporate law, and Tenant lawyer advice.

Contact us : Ram bajad - 098275 25296, Yogesh Bajad : 9827394184

 
 
Location: Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your right is to register an FIR, know what is the difference between FIR and NCR

Image
Your right is to register an FIR, know what is the difference between FIR and NCR It is often heard that 'Police is not registering First Information Report (FIR)'. In such a situation, many times the victim has to go to the police station, then many times have to give up and decide not to file an FIR. This is all because people do not know about their rights to register an FIR. Under the law, the police cannot refuse to register an FIR. It is also mentioned in section 154 of CRPC. Crimes in India are divided into two categories. The first is cognizable offence and the second is non cognizable offence. Serious crime The police do not require a warrant for arrest in a cognizable offense. These are serious crimes in which the police have to take immediate action. These do not require the magistrate to order the police to initiate an investigation. These include cases such as rape, murder, illegal confinement, damage to public property and taking bribe by public serva...
Read more

YR Associates Updates - High court got six judges

Image
YR Associates Updates - High court got six judges High court got six judges, husband and wife sworn together, this happened for the second time in the history of the country Another history was added with the swearing-in of six judges in the Punjab-Haryana High Court on Thursday. This is the first time in the history of the Punjab-Haryana High Court and the second time in the history of the country when the husband and wife have sworn on the same day. Earlier, Justice AK Pathak and Justice Indermeet Kaur took the oath of office and secrecy together in the Delhi High Court. Chief Justice Ravi Shankar Jha administered the oath to both husband and wife. While Vivek Puri is the District and Sessions Judge of Mohali, his wife Archana Puri is the Presiding Officer of the Punjab State Transport Appellate Authority. The names of both were sent together by the Punjab-Haryana High Court Collegium. After this it was pending for approval of the Central Government. The Cent...
Read more

Supreme Court verdict on reservation:

Supreme Court verdict on reservation: There was a fierce commotion in Lok Sabha, know which party said in the House The government on Monday made it clear that it is committed to reservation for SC and ST, amid allegations of being anti-Dalit by opposition parties over a Supreme Court ruling on reservation in appointments and promotions. In his statement in the Lok Sabha on the issue, Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot said, "The central government is not a party to this issue and this decision is being considered at a high level." He said that no affidavit was sought from the Government of India regarding this decision, the Government of India will take the right steps. Gehlot said, "We are committed and dedicated to reservation." He said that this is the case of 2012 when the Congress government was in Uttarakhand. The minister also said that the government will consider this issue in a holistic manner. On this, the members of the Congre...
Read more