The Chief Justice will decide on the live streaming of the court proceedings

The Chief Justice will decide on the live streaming of the court proceedings

The Supreme Court said on Tuesday (4 February) that the Chief Justice would hear the issue in the administrative section regarding the implementation of his 2018 decision to allow live streaming of court hearings of matters of constitutional and national importance. Denying any judicial order on the case, a three-member bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said it would be appropriate that the Chief Justice hear the issue in the administrative part. The bench also had Justice Vineet Saran and Justice MR Shah.
https://yogesh-ram-bajad-advocate-associates-in-indore-yr.business.site/


Additional Solicitor General Madhavi Dewan, appearing on behalf of the apex court general secretary, told the bench that the process of implementing the 2018 judgment has already started. Attorney General KK Venugopal told the bench that the general secretary has started the work of preparing the infrastructure for live streaming.

The bench said that there can be no order on the administrative part in the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice has to consider the issue in the administrative part. The bench said that can we direct the Parliament to enact a law on this or that subject? Let the case be heard before the Chief Justice in the administrative part.

The apex court, in a judgment in 2018, allowed live streaming of court hearings of matters of constitutional and national importance. Live streaming must be allowed. The court said that there should not be live streaming of sensitive cases such as marriage disputes or sexual harassment cases.


Yogesh and Ram Bajad & Associates with law firm. A law firm is normally an organization between legal counselors who have met up to offer their skill to customers under one name. We provide you this service like – Cyber Law, criminal law, corporate law, and Tenant lawyer advice.
 
Contact us : 098275 25296
Location: India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your right is to register an FIR, know what is the difference between FIR and NCR

Image
Your right is to register an FIR, know what is the difference between FIR and NCR It is often heard that 'Police is not registering First Information Report (FIR)'. In such a situation, many times the victim has to go to the police station, then many times have to give up and decide not to file an FIR. This is all because people do not know about their rights to register an FIR. Under the law, the police cannot refuse to register an FIR. It is also mentioned in section 154 of CRPC. Crimes in India are divided into two categories. The first is cognizable offence and the second is non cognizable offence. Serious crime The police do not require a warrant for arrest in a cognizable offense. These are serious crimes in which the police have to take immediate action. These do not require the magistrate to order the police to initiate an investigation. These include cases such as rape, murder, illegal confinement, damage to public property and taking bribe by public serva...
Read more

YR Associates Updates - High court got six judges

Image
YR Associates Updates - High court got six judges High court got six judges, husband and wife sworn together, this happened for the second time in the history of the country Another history was added with the swearing-in of six judges in the Punjab-Haryana High Court on Thursday. This is the first time in the history of the Punjab-Haryana High Court and the second time in the history of the country when the husband and wife have sworn on the same day. Earlier, Justice AK Pathak and Justice Indermeet Kaur took the oath of office and secrecy together in the Delhi High Court. Chief Justice Ravi Shankar Jha administered the oath to both husband and wife. While Vivek Puri is the District and Sessions Judge of Mohali, his wife Archana Puri is the Presiding Officer of the Punjab State Transport Appellate Authority. The names of both were sent together by the Punjab-Haryana High Court Collegium. After this it was pending for approval of the Central Government. The Cent...
Read more

Supreme Court verdict on reservation:

Supreme Court verdict on reservation: There was a fierce commotion in Lok Sabha, know which party said in the House The government on Monday made it clear that it is committed to reservation for SC and ST, amid allegations of being anti-Dalit by opposition parties over a Supreme Court ruling on reservation in appointments and promotions. In his statement in the Lok Sabha on the issue, Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot said, "The central government is not a party to this issue and this decision is being considered at a high level." He said that no affidavit was sought from the Government of India regarding this decision, the Government of India will take the right steps. Gehlot said, "We are committed and dedicated to reservation." He said that this is the case of 2012 when the Congress government was in Uttarakhand. The minister also said that the government will consider this issue in a holistic manner. On this, the members of the Congre...
Read more